Lack of trust in our USA "Intelligence Community Assessment" of Russian interference in the 2016 USA presidential election [LINK1]; Is it simply "healthy skepticism"? Or appropriate "disparagement"? [LINK2]
Look through the links and possibly decide for yourselves whether or not we should simply wholesale buy what our USA intelligence community tells us concerning Russian interference in the 2016 USA presidential election.
A person associated with Wikileaks claims they received by hand the leaked emails from a disgruntled D.C. insider(s) [LINK].
Assange says Russia did not provide Wikileaks the leaked emails, and Assange/Wikileaks provided the leaked emails to the public in the first place [LINK].
"...no U.S. intelligence agency has performed its own forensics analysis on the hacked servers." [LINK1]. Instead, the USA intelligence community relied on a private third party hired by the DNC called "CrowdStrike", a company co-founded by Russian expatriate Dmitri Alperovitch, a key figure to the investigation [LINK2] who is also a senior fellow with the Atlantic Council [LINK3], a D.C. based NATO-centric political think tank that, along with NATO, has had it out for Russia for a long time now [LINK4].
I look forward to your comments.